A Free Voice


Obama shows his true self by censorship and intimidation
September 28, 2008, 6:59 am
Filed under: fascism, Freedom, McCain, Obama, Republicans, Tyranny

Just days before the election we are now starting to see Obama’s true self as he is now using police state-tactics to intimidate peoplefrom telling the truth (what he calls “lies”) against him.

 — Obama’s true self is therefore coming to the surface and we can now see him for what he truly is: A man who cannot take criticism.

According to Newsmax.com,

The Obama camp has been threatening television and radio stations to keep them from airing anti-Obama ads. . . .

Earlier this week, the National Rifle Association’s Political Victory Fund released a series of radio and television spots to educate gun owners and sportsmen about Barack Obama’s longstanding anti-gun record. In response to the NRA-PVF ads, a clearly panicked Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) are doing everything they can to hide Obama’s real record by mounting a coordinated assault on the First Amendment.

They have gone to desperate and outrageous lengths to try to silence your NRA by bullying media outlets with threats of lawsuits if they run NRA-PVF’s ads.

The Obama camp is particularly angry with an NRA ad entitled “Hunter” which lays out Obama’s record on gun control.

(Link)

Seeing now that Barack Obama is a man who can’t take criticism I have come to the conclusion that he does not have the temperamentto be the President of the United States. — What Obama should know (if he doesn’t know already) is that the criticisms will not stop when and if he arrives in the White House (God forbid). If anything, being the President will only make him a magnet for even more criticism.

So if Obama becomes the next President, how will he deal with those critical of him? — Will he try to censure them also, like what he is attempting to do with the NRA? — My ugly prediction is “yes.” This means the censorship of conservative talk radio, television networks critical of him, as well as websites. — Take note: This wouldn’t be the Un-Fairness doctrine in which both sides would be imposed on people not wishing to hear them, but rather censorship of one side at the favoring of the other.

This is the same tactic that Hugo Chavez has been known to do. Chavez shut down a TV network that was critical of him and violated freedom of speech. What Obama is trying is no different or better than what this fascist (and I mean “fascist”) dictator has done. — Anyone, whatever their party affiliation, who is for censorship, against dissent, and against freedom of speech is a fascist. — And that Includes Barack Obama. — Barack “Hugo Chavez” Obama.

If he wants to be 44th president then he has to get over his attitude of being above criticism because that is an attitude that only someone unfit for the presidency would have.

What we are seeing here is a preview of how Barack “Hugo Chavez” Obama would run the country if he were elected. This man must lose —

Advertisements

6 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Many Americans own guns and Obama knows this and he will not get their votes if they learn that he is against gun owners! Any NRA member or anyone that owns a gun would be crazy to vote for Obama!

Comment by goodtimepolitics

1. Obama challenges the 2nd Amendment … The Right To Bear Arms.

2. Obama challenges the 1st Amendment … The right of Free Speech.
Obama pressures all media who accepts NRA advertising.

3. Obama wants a Civil National Security Force … with the same budget as the Pentagon.

So, Obama does not want any opposition, so he stops Freedom of Speech.
Then, to make any opposition defenseless, he wants to take away our right to bear arms.
Next, he wants a Civil National Security force to put down any insurrection.

Sounds like the stepping stones to a leftist dictator taking over this country.

Comment by PAUL REVERE

Barack Obama has the support of the Hunters Organization of America. He has no issues with bearing arms. Illegal ones are a different matter – I do not believe any NRA member wants kids getting their hands on illegal firearms do they?

This blog post contains no actual information on what legislation Obama has voted on that will restrict LEGAL gun ownership. The link you supplied was broken.

So, please, I don’t have to defend Obama if he has done nothing wrong, show me some legislation and prove me wrong.

Comment by Smokin Joe

SmokingJoe says:

“Barack Obama has the support of the Hunters Organization of America. He has no issues with bearing arms. Illegal ones are a different matter -”

Actually he has supported legislation for gun restrictions. And not just on illegal weapons either.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Barack_Obama#Gun_control

“I do not believe any NRA member wants kids getting their hands on illegal firearms do they?”

I don’t think anyone wants that. But all the same, it is a constitutional right to own a firearm and constitutional rights are just not negotiable. — And parents are the ones to keep guns out of the hands of children, not government.

“This blog post contains no actual information on what legislation Obama has voted on that will restrict LEGAL gun ownership. The link you supplied was broken.”

Really? I just checked all three of them and they all worked. Must be your internet connection.

“So, please, I don’t have to defend Obama if he has done nothing wrong, show me some legislation and prove me wrong.”

Okay, from CNN:

“when asked about case, Obama said he believes “that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can’t constrain the exercise of that right.”

And Link: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/issues.gun.html

In other words, he says we have the right, but government can regulate and limmit our second ammendment right.

— In other words, he wants to compromise the right. Hmmm. You know, anybody who allows the government to compromise our rights — even by a little bit — doesn’t deserve them.

But the basic issue of the post is that Obama was trying to ban the NRA ads. So don’t give me that bullshit of Obama not doing anything wrong because he clearly is.

Even if he wasn’t in violation of the second ammendment rights, which he clearly is, his attempts to ban NRA ads he just doesn’t like are violations of the FIRST ammendment rights.

In other words, Obama’s a fascist!

Comment by krissmith777

[…] Obama then says he will “listen to you when we disagree.” — Really? — Then whay has Obama tried to shut up descent in the past? For example, he tried to censor NRA ads because he just didn’t like what they said about him. (Click here) […]

Pingback by Obama’s infomercial — Eight problems with it « A Free Voice

[…] a man that has no respect for America nor for the first and second amendments of the constitution (Click here). When that day comes I’ll say “You voted for him, I didn’t.” — […]

Pingback by Terrorist Organization Praises Obama Win! « A Free Voice




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: